Intent-Based Trading Raises New Questions About Order Flow
Solver networks now route a meaningful share of decentralized exchange volume, concentrating execution in a handful of sophisticated firms.
Intent-based protocols, in which users sign a desired outcome and competing solvers determine execution, have grown to route a significant minority of decentralized exchange volume on major networks.
Advocates say the design produces better prices because solvers compete in an auction and absorb failed transaction costs. Data published by the largest such network supports a modest price improvement against direct routing.
Critics point to concentration. Three firms win the majority of auctions on most networks, an outcome that resembles the payment-for-order-flow arrangements regulators have scrutinised in equities.
Researchers note that solver competition depends on access to inventory and private liquidity, advantages that compound over time.
About the author
Markets Data Reporter
Hannah Weiss builds and interrogates the datasets behind D2CA's markets coverage, from exchange order book depth to on-chain settlement volumes. She studied statistics and worked in quantitative research before turning to journalism.
D2CA.org reports on digital asset markets. This article is journalism, not investment advice. Corrections and clarifications: see our corrections policy.